Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare nerve, joint, and migraine recovery logs from real patients—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Migraine, Pain & Joints Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Migraine, Pain & Joints Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42713876 • DOI: 10.2337/dc26-0758

Evaluating Improvement in Pain and Sensory Function When Using High-Frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Individuals With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (PDN-Sensory).

Diabetes care • 2026 Nov • Vol. 49 (11) : 2022-2032 • ISSN 1935-5548
Authors: Robert W Hurley, Elias S Siraj, Shawn Sills, Mitchell Engle, Curtis Johnson, Rodica Pop-Busui, David Armstrong, Andrew Boulton, Brian Levy, Solomon Tesfaye, George Grunberger, Erika Petersen, Rose Azalde, Deborah Edgar, Samer Nakhle, Cong Yu, Khurram Khan, Ioannis Skaribas, Kasra Amirdelfan, Quang Nguyen, Jessica Jameson, Maged Guirguis, Kerry Bradley, Janus S Patel, Daniel J Bintrim, David Caraway
Pain Medicine, Anesthesiology, Translational Neuroscience and Public Health, Pain Outcomes Lab, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The PDN-Sensory randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effects of high-frequency 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation (10-kHz SCS) on pain and sensory function in individuals with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants were randomized 1:1 to conventional medical management (CMM) alone or 10-kHz SCS plus CMM. The primary and key secondary end points were the proportions of participants with pain response (≥50% lower-limb pain relief) and sensory improvement (≥3-point reduction in modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score [mTCNS]). Hierarchical secondary outcomes included intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), sleep, and health- and neuropathy-related quality of life (QoL). IENFD and mTCNS assessments were allocation blinded.

RESULTS

A total of 91 participants were randomly assigned to CMM alone (n = 50) or 10-kHz SCS plus CMM (n = 41). In a modified intention-to-treat worst-case analysis, 27 of 34 participants in the 10-kHz SCS group who underwent a temporary trial achieved the primary outcome, versus 2 of 50 CMM-alone participants (P < 0.001). Among those with 6-month data, mTCNS sensory improvement was observed in 16 of 29 (55.2%) 10-kHz SCS participants versus 12 of 48 (25.0%) CMM-alone participants (P = 0.01). The mean change in lower-calf IENFD was 0.58 fibers/mm with 10-kHz SCS versus -0.07 with CMM alone (P = 0.03). Eight of 10 hierarchical secondary end points were met (including sleep and QoL).

CONCLUSIONS

The PDN-Sensory RCT replicated previous pain-reduction findings and showed prespecified, objective improvements in sensory function and IENFD. These 6-month findings support clinically meaningful benefit and are consistent with a potential disease-modifying effect that requires longer-term confirmation.

Publication Classification: Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Diabetic Neuropathies Female Male Middle Aged Spinal Cord Stimulation Quality of Life Aged Adult Pain Management