Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare real-world patient outcomes, lab numbers, and doctor visit tips—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Gut, Labs & Supplements Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Gut, Labs & Supplements Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42937426 • DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2600065

E-Cigarettes with and without Behavioral Support for Smoking Cessation.

NEJM evidence • 2026 Nov • Vol. 5 (11) : EVIDoa2600065 • ISSN 2766-5526
Authors: Katie Myers Smith, Dunja Przulj, Francesca Pesola, Daniella Ladmore, Hayden J McRobbie, Anna Phillips-Waller, Kirsten McAlpine, William Ricketts, Peter Sasieni, Steve Parrott, Jinshuo Li, Linda Bauld, Fiona Dobbie, Martine Miller, Peter Hajek
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trials that have shown that e-cigarettes are effective in helping people quit smoking typically provided behavioral support in addition to e-cigarettes. Behavioral support is not always available or wanted, but it is not known whether e-cigarettes are effective without it.

METHODS

Participants who smoked and were motivated to quit were randomly assigned to National Health Service SmokeFree automated email messages (supportive messages), an e-cigarette starter pack alone (EC-only), or an e-cigarette starter pack plus multisession telephone-based behavioral support (EC+). The primary outcome was biochemically validated sustained abstinence from smoking at 6 months. Participants who were lost to follow-up or did not provide biochemical validation were assumed to continue to smoke. A significance level of 0.025 was prespecified for each of the two primary comparisons (EC-only vs. supportive messages and EC+ vs. EC-only).

RESULTS

The 6-month abstinence rates were 6.4% in the supportive messages group, 11.3% in the EC-only group (EC-only vs. supportive messages relative risk 1.76; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 3.01; P=0.018), and 21.1% in the EC+ group, (EC+ vs. EC-only relative risk 1.87; 97.5% CI, 1.27 to 2.75; P<0.001). Serious adverse events were reported by 8.1%, 10.8%, and 10.7% of participants in the supportive messages, EC-only, and EC+ groups, respectively. There were four deaths, two in the EC-only group and two in the EC+ group.

CONCLUSIONS

E-cigarettes without further support were more effective than supportive messaging in helping people achieve sustained validated abstinence from smoking at 6 months. E-cigarettes with multisession telephone-based support were more effective than e-cigarettes alone. (Funded by The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR129627); ISRCTN number, 61193406.).

Publication Classification: Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Smoking Cessation Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Female Male Adult Electronic Mail Middle Aged Telephone Behavior Therapy