Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare real-world patient outcomes, lab numbers, and doctor visit tips—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Gut, Labs & Supplements Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Gut, Labs & Supplements Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42973282 • DOI: 10.1111/pai.70517

Five-year outcomes of the STOP-AD randomised controlled trial: Long-term effects of early emollient therapy in high-risk infants.

Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology • 2026 Nov • Vol. 37 (11) • ISSN 1399-3038
Authors: Molly L Cremin, Sadhbh Hurley, Claire O'Halloran, Maria De Los Angeles Gonzalez, Carol Ni Chaoimh, Roberto Velasco Zuniga, Juan Trujillo, Alan D Irvine, Jonathan O'B Hourihane
Irish Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research (INFANT), HRB Clinical Research Facility Cork (CRF-C), Cork, Ireland.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early-life skin barrier enhancement has been proposed as a strategy to prevent atopic dermatitis (AD), but results from emollient prevention trials have been inconsistent, and long-term outcomes remain poorly defined. The STOP-AD trial previously demonstrated a reduction in AD incidence following brief early emollient use in high-risk infants. Whether these effects persist beyond infancy is unknown.

METHODS

This study reports the blinded five-year follow-up of the STOP-AD single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Term infants at high risk of AD were randomised within 4 days of birth to either twice-daily whole-body emollient application for the first 8 weeks of life or to standard routine skin care. At 5 years, participants underwent blinded, in-person clinical assessment. AD was diagnosed using UK Working Party Diagnostic Criteria, and disease severity was assessed using SCORAD. Primary outcome was point prevalence of AD at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included AD severity. Complete-case analyses were supplemented by multiple imputation to assess the impact of missing data.

RESULTS

A total of 177 children completed the five-year follow-up. The point prevalence of AD at 5 years was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (12.3% vs. 24.0%; RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26-1.02; p = .048). Among children with AD, disease severity was also lower in the intervention group (median SCORAD 12.0 [IQR 8.2-15.2] vs. 19.6 [IQR 11.8-23.4]; p = .034). Multiple imputation to account for missing outcome data produced a similar treatment effect (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-1.03; p = .060), although with greater uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Early, short-term emollient use initiated in the neonatal period was associated with lower AD prevalence and severity at 5 years in high-risk children. Although the effect estimate remained similar following multiple imputation, uncertainty due to attrition remained. These findings suggest that brief early-life barrier support may influence longer-term AD outcomes and support further investigation of the timing and formulation of preventive skin-barrier interventions.

Publication Classification: Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Emollients Dermatitis, Atopic Infant Male Female Follow-Up Studies Child, Preschool Treatment Outcome Infant, Newborn Severity of Illness Index Prevalence