Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare real-world patient outcomes, lab numbers, and doctor visit tips—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Gut, Labs & Supplements Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Gut, Labs & Supplements Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42975224 • DOI: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_366_25

Comparison of Traumatic Complications following Prostate Biopsy in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Prostate Disease Using Biopty Gun versus Semiautomatic Needle.

The Nigerian postgraduate medical journal • 2026 Nov • Vol. 33 (6) : 767-772 • ISSN 1117-1936
Authors: Okechukwu Valentine Onyebum, Frederick Obiefuna Ugwumba, Okwudili Calistus Amu, Agharighom David Okoh, Ugochukwu Uzodimma Nnadozie, Charles Chidiebele Maduba, Chinonso Odo, Augustine Obasi Ulebe
Department of Surgery, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prostate biopsy has evolved to improve yield and reduce complications. The development of biopty guns added to this trend. It is an improvement on the semiautomatic needle.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare semi-automatic and fully-automatic biopsy devices used for digitally guided transrectal prostate biopsy for the rate and extent of post-biopsy pain and bleeding complications.

METHODOLOGY

Sixty-four patients were randomised into two groups, each with 32 patients. Group 1 patients were biopsied with 16G Medplus ® semi-automatic biopsy needles, whereas Bard-Magnum ® biopty gun with 16G needles was used for Group 2. Twelve systematic cores were taken from both groups. Post-biopsy pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. The rate and extent of post-biopsy haematuria/urethral bleeding and rectal bleeding were evaluated. Data were collected using a structured pro forma and analysed using IBM-SPSS.

RESULTS

Sixty-four men participated in the study. Haematuria/urethral bleeding occurred in 37.5% (12) and 31.25% (10) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Bladder irrigation was done for 8.3% (1) and 20% (2) of those who bled from Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Significant rectal bleeding occurred in 31.25% (10) and 28.13% (9) patients from Groups 1 and 2, respectively. More pain was noted in Group 1. These differences in bleeding complications and pain were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The two devices did not exhibit significant differences in terms of pain or bleeding complications when used for prostate biopsy.

Publication Classification: Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Male Middle Aged Hematuria Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Prostate Aged Biopsy, Needle Hemorrhage Prostatic Diseases Pain Measurement Prostatic Neoplasms Needles