Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare real-world patient outcomes, lab numbers, and doctor visit tips—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Gut, Labs & Supplements Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Gut, Labs & Supplements Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42975601 • DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00457

Prognostic value of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio after percutaneous coronary intervention.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology • 2026 Nov • Vol. 22 (21) : e1157-e1167 • ISSN 1969-6213
Authors: Rui Zhang, Jingjing Xu, Changdong Guan, Yao Jiang, Yanpu Shi, Shengxian Tu, Bo Yu, Guosheng Fu, Yujie Zhou, Jian'an Wang, Yundai Chen, Jun Pu, Kefei Dou, Weixian Yang, Yongjian Wu, Shubin Qiao, Gregg W Stone, Lei Song
Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) physiological indices have prognostic relevance. Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) enables wire-free, rapid, single-view functional assessment, yet its long-term prognostic value after PCI remains incompletely established.

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of post-PCI μQFR for long-term adverse outcomes.

METHODS

This prespecified subgroup analysis of the FAVOR III China trial included 3,825 patients. All PCI-treated vessels with a reference diameter ≥2.5 mm and 50-90% diameter stenosis were analysed for offline post-PCI μQFR. The primary endpoint was 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; including death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven revascularisation).

RESULTS

Post-PCI &#x3bc;QFR was successfully analysed in 4,196 vessels from 3,455 patients, with similar distributions between the randomised treatment groups. At 5 years, a low post-PCI &#x3bc;QFR was associated with a higher incidence of MACE compared with the intermediate and high post-PCI &#x3bc;QFR tertiles (23.1% vs 19.0% vs 17.2%; p=0.001). Using the highest tertile (&#x3bc;QFR>0.95) as a reference, adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-1.34) for the intermediate tertile (0.92-0.95) and 1.30 (95% CI: 1.06-1.60) for the lowest tertile (&#x3bc;QFR &#x2264;0.91). Using a receiver operating characteristic-derived cutoff, MACE occurred more frequently in patients with post-PCI &#x3bc;QFR <0.94 (22.3% vs 17.4%, aHR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04-1.47; p=0.02) than in those with post-PCI &#x3bc;QFR &#x2265;0.94. No significant interaction was observed between treatment strategy and post-PCI &#x3bc;QFR (p for interaction=0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-PCI &#x3bc;QFR distributions were similar between treatment groups, but lower values were associated with higher 5-year adverse event risk without significant treatment interaction. Its limited binary discrimination supports use as a continuous metric for post-PCI physiological risk stratification. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03656848).

Publication Classification: Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Prognosis Female Male Middle Aged Treatment Outcome Aged Myocardial Infarction Coronary Circulation Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Angiography Predictive Value of Tests