Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare home blood-pressure logs, statin muscle-pain fixes, and ApoB results—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Heart, Blood Pressure & Lipids Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Heart, Blood Pressure & Lipids Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42975689 • DOI: 10.1007/s00520-026-11434-y

Effectiveness of home-based exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity in cancer survivors exposed to cardiotoxic therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer • 2026 Nov • Vol. 34 (11) • ISSN 1433-7339
Authors: Wei Wang, Geraldine A Lee, Wen Zhang, Xianliang Liu
School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of home-based exercise (HBE) interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT) in cancer survivors.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of seven electronic databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2000 to October 2025. The participants were cancer survivors who had received cardiotoxic therapies. The interventions were structured HBE programmes. Eligible studies were those that reported on any outcomes related to CTR-CVT. The primary outcomes included direct cardiotoxicity parameters (e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] and global longitudinal strain [GLS]) and cardiac biomarkers (e.g., troponins and B-type natriuretic peptide); clinical cardiovascular events (e.g., heart failure and arrhythmias); cardiorespiratory fitness (e.g., peak oxygen uptake [VO2 peak]); and (d) functional capacity (e.g., the six-minute walk test [6MWT]). Two researchers independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. Meta-analyses were conducted using R software.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 851 participants were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the&#xa0;HBE interventions significantly improved VO2 peak (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.35&#xa0;mL/kg/min, 95% CI: 1.26 to 3.43, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), which&#xa0;indicated improved cardiorespiratory fitness. Subgroup analysis found larger effects for longer-duration interventions (24&#xa0;to&#xa0;52&#xa0;weeks), mHealth use, and cancer Stage III/IV. Evidence on direct cardiotoxicity parameters and biomarkers was limited, as only one study assessed these outcomes. No significant improvements were found in the 6MWT or health-related quality of life&#xa0;(HRQoL).

CONCLUSION

While HBE improved cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak) and mitigated functional decline in cancer survivors, its ability to prevent CTR-CVT was unproven. Future adequately powered trials should incorporate direct cardiotoxicity assessments to establish true cardioprotective efficacy&#xa0;and implementation studies to optimise real-world delivery.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

not applicable.

Publication Classification: Journal Article Systematic Review Meta-Analysis Review
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Cardiorespiratory Fitness Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Cardiotoxicity Cancer Survivors Exercise Therapy Neoplasms Home Care Services Cardiovascular Diseases Antineoplastic Agents