Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare real-world patient outcomes, lab numbers, and doctor visit tips—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Gut, Labs & Supplements Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Gut, Labs & Supplements Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42977962 • DOI: 10.1186/s13063-026-10039-4

Collaborative Care and Everyday Planning in Care Counselling (CoPlan study): study protocol of a pragmatic randomized clinical trial and protocol changes to quasi-experimental evaluation during recruitment.

Trials • 2026 Nov • Vol. 27 (1) • ISSN 1745-6215
Authors: Ingrid Hendlmeier, Martina Schäufele, Petra Meuer, Gisela Büchele, Ana Babac, Klaus Pfeiffer
Department Social Work, Technical University of Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany. i.hendlmeier@th-mannheim.de.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

BACKGROUND

Family members are the primary source of support for older care recipients. Promoting cooperative strategies between family members may foster shared solutions to care-related challenges. Based on our previous research we developed a dyadic problem-solving intervention that equally addresses the needs of both caregivers and care recipients.

METHODS

This pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of the intervention under routine conditions within a national care counselling service setting. Due to recruitment obstacles and low participant enrolment the randomized design was modified to a non-randomized study. Main inclusion criterion for caregivers was a positive screening of desire to change the care situation, frequent caregiving challenges, or difficulty managing care. Participants are assigned to either the CoPlan intervention or control group with routine care counselling. Self-reported questionnaires are administered at baseline (t0) and 3 months post-intervention (t2) to collect endpoint data, with an intermediate non-endpoint assessment following the initial counselling (t1). Primary and secondary endpoint comparisons are based on data collected at t2 controlled for baseline values. Primary outcome is the quality of informal care (QiC), main secondary outcomes include caregiver self-efficacy, depressive symptoms, and positive aspects of caregiving. A process evaluation assesses intervention dose, fidelity, and experiences of interventionists, care counsellors of a German long-term care insurance, and participants.

DISCUSSION

This study represents one of the few translational studies in care counselling research. By promoting shared appraisals and open communication in a dyadic approach, the novel counselling method addresses a largely underexplored area. The difficulty in recruiting participants through care counsellors, along with the resulting study design modification, highlights the difficulties of conducting studies within real-world practice settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (German Clinical Trials Register), DRKS00032492 . Registered on 5 September 2023 (current status: recruitment completed).

Publication Classification: Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Caregivers Cooperative Behavior Counseling Germany Patient Selection Problem Solving Research Design Self Efficacy Surveys and Questionnaires Time Factors Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic