Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare real-world patient outcomes, lab numbers, and doctor visit tips—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Gut, Labs & Supplements Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Gut, Labs & Supplements Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42978043 • DOI: 10.1080/15502783.2026.2757309

Exploratory serum renal biomarker and eGFR responses to high-protein diets during resistance versus concurrent training in resistance-trained men.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition • 2026 Dec • Vol. 23 (1) : 2757309 • ISSN 1550-2783
Authors: Reza Bagheri, Zohreh Karimi, Hamid Ghobadi, Fatemeh Kazeminasab, Richard B Kreider, Gordon A Ferns, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan, Hamidreza Malekinezhad, Hossein Hatamzadeh, Mehdi Kargarfard
Department of Exercise Physiology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

BACKGROUND

High protein intake is common among resistance-trained athletes, but its association with renal biomarkers across different exercise modalities remains uncertain. This study investigated whether consuming a high-protein diet (3.2 g·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹) during 16 weeks of resistance training (RT) or concurrent training (CT) affects renal biomarkers and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in resistance-trained men.

METHODS

Forty-eight resistance-trained men (26 ± 6 years; BMI 25.6 ± 2.9 kg·m⁻²) were randomized to 16 weeks of RT or CT (4 sessions·wk⁻¹) while consuming either 1.6 or 3.2 g·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹ of protein in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Forty-four participants with complete pre- and post-intervention data were analyzed. Fasting blood samples were assessed for blood urea nitrogen (BUN), BUN/creatinine ratio, cystatin C, and eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI creatinine (2021), cystatin C (2012), and creatinine-cystatin C (2021) equations. Within-group changes were evaluated using paired t-tests, and factorial effects were assessed using linear mixed-effects models (Time × Training × Protein).

RESULTS

No statistically significant Time × Protein or Time × Training × Protein interactions were detected for any renal biomarker or eGFR estimate (all p ≥ 0.182). No significant within-group changes occurred in the 1.6 g·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹ groups (all p > 0.05). In both 3.2 g·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹ groups, BUN and cystatin C increased (all p ≤ 0.017), while eGFR estimates decreased (all p ≤ 0.009). The BUN/creatinine ratio remained unchanged (p ≥ 0.614). However, these within-group findings were descriptive because the corresponding interaction effects were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In resistance-trained men, 16 weeks of high protein intake did not produce statistically detectable differences in renal biomarker or eGFR changes compared with moderate protein intake, irrespective of training modality. Although modest increases in BUN and cystatin C and small decreases in eGFR estimates were observed within the high-protein groups, these findings were not supported by significant factorial interactions. The limited sample size precludes excluding clinically meaningful differences, warranting further investigation in larger studies.

Publication Classification: Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Male Resistance Training Biomarkers Adult Glomerular Filtration Rate Creatinine Diet, High-Protein Blood Urea Nitrogen Cystatin C Young Adult Kidney Dietary Proteins