Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare GLP-1 titration schedules, nausea fixes, and protein routines—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to GLP-1s, Weight & Muscle Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in GLP-1s, Weight & Muscle Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42980655 • DOI: 10.1093/europace/euag178

A randomized comparison of comprehensive weight loss intervention vs. usual care on recurrences of atrial fibrillation in obese patients after catheter ablation: HOBIT-AF trial.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology • 2026 Nov • Vol. 28 (11) • ISSN 1532-2092
Authors: Kristýna Koščálová, Peter Novodvorský, Iva Jakubíková, Adam Ševčík, Adam Rafaj, Iveta Pleyerová, Kristýna Heidu, Jakub Štoček, Helena Kratochvílová, Luděk Horváth, Miloš Mráz, Jan Mareš, Dan Wichterle, Josef Kautzner, Martin Haluzík
Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Vídeňská 1958/9, Prague 4 140 21, Czechia.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

AIMS

Obesity is one of the strongest risk factors for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), and its reduction is associated with the alleviation of AF burden. The HOBIT-AF study aimed to evaluate the impact of complex weight loss interventions on AF recurrence rate in obese individuals after catheter ablation (CA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The HOBIT-AF was a randomized controlled trial with a 15-month treatment period (3-18 months post CA) involving complex weight-reducing interventions in the active arm. The primary outcome was the change in AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) burden assessed from baseline and the final 14-day Holter monitoring. A total of 167 individuals (aged 59 years, body mass index of 35.6 kg/m2) were randomized into the active (n = 85) and control group (n = 82). At the end of the treatment period, a mean reduction of 6.8 ± 7.0% of the initial body weight accompanied by improvement of metabolic parameters was achieved in the active group. The AF/AT burden change was 0.6 ± 2.5% (95% CI: -4.2-5.5%) in the active group and -0.9 ± 1.8% (95% CI: -4.5-3.0%) in the control group. The AF/AT recurrence-free survival during the 3-18-month follow-up period was comparable between groups (70.4% vs. 69.6%).

CONCLUSION

HOBIT-AF trial showed that despite the beneficial effect of body weight reduction on metabolic profile of obese patients with predominantly paroxysmal AF after CA, no reduction in AF/AT recurrence was observed in comparison with control patients. This may be likely due to low AF burden after previous CA, limiting further improvement.

Publication Classification: Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation Obesity Middle Aged Female Male Recurrence Weight Loss Treatment Outcome Electrocardiography, Ambulatory Time Factors Risk Factors Aged