Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare real-world patient outcomes, lab numbers, and doctor visit tips—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Gut, Labs & Supplements Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Gut, Labs & Supplements Space →
Official NIH NLM MEDLINE / PubMed Citation • PMID: 42994875 • DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000051517

Prognostic value of anti-gp210 antibodies in primary biliary cholangitis: A Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine • 2026 Nov • Vol. 105 (45) : e51517 • ISSN 1536-5964
Authors: Yazhen Zhang, Yujiao Jin, Miaochan Wang, Kenv Pan, Aifang Xu
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hangzhou Xixi Hospital, Hangzhou Sixth People's Hospital, Hangzhou Xixi Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Verbatim Formal Study Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by portal inflammation and immune-mediated nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis. Recent studies have shown that anti-gp210 antibodies are associated with the prognosis of PBC. Here, we conducted a pooled analysis of the relationship between anti-gp210 antibodies and the prognosis of PBC patients to identify high-risk patients early and provide individualized interventions.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases were searched until January 2025. A meta-analysis was undertaken using a fixed-effects model and 95% confidence interval (CI) when no statistically significant heterogeneity existed; otherwise, a random-effects statistical model was used.

RESULTS

A total of 12 records were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The results of our meta-analysis showed that anti-gp210 positive PBC patients had a higher incidence of liver failure (relative risk (RR), 6.11; 95% CI, 3.16-11.81) and mortality (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.55-2.37) and a lower ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) response rate (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89) compared with anti-gp210 negative patients. Moreover, the presence of anti-gp210 antibodies was independently associated with a poor prognosis in patients with PBC (hazard ratios (HR), 4.53; 95% CI, 2.83-7.26). In addition, anti-gp210 positive PBC patients had higher serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) (mean difference (MD), 53.03; 95% CI, 3.70-102.36), immunoglobulin M (IgM) (MD, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.80-1.78), and immunoglobulin G (IgG) (MD, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.07-2.06) levels and lower albumin (MD, -1.74; 95% CI, -2.80 to - 0.69) levels.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, PBC patients with positive anti-gp210 have a worse prognosis than those with negative anti-gp210. Incorporating anti-gp210 testing into clinical practice could enhance risk stratification and guide personalized management, ultimately improving outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Publication Classification: Journal Article Systematic Review Meta-Analysis
NLM MeSH Descriptors: Humans Prognosis Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary Autoantibodies Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins Ursodeoxycholic Acid