Reading this clinical breakthrough? See how real patients are applying these numbers in real life. Compare nerve, joint, and migraine recovery logs from real patients—100% free with a private @handle and zero login wall.
Click to Ask a Question or Post Your Experience ▾
Post to Migraine, Pain & Joints Space (15 Seconds • No Account or Email Required)
Or read existing discussions in Migraine, Pain & Joints Space →
★ Breakthrough Medical Research • 15 Landmark Multi-Trial Guides • 6,280 Indexed Studies

Gut Health, Pain Relief, Dermatology & Autoimmune Trials — Clinical Trial Breakdowns & PubMed Evidence

Pharmacokinetic crossover trials on GelShield Extended-Release Metformin gut tolerability, topical Diclofenac patch RCTs for targeted joint relief without GI bleeding, and Phase 3 biologic clearance trials in psoriasis and autoimmune disease. Explore 546 indexed studies and multi-trial syntheses with verified PubMed PMIDs, participant sample sizes (N), and Absolute vs. Relative Risk numbers.

★ #1 Lead Breakthrough Study • NEJM SURMOUNT-1 (176 Weeks) N = 1,032 Adults • p < 0.001

Once-Weekly Tirzepatide Cuts Type 2 Diabetes Progression by 94% Over 3 Years—With a 22.9% Sustained Weight Reduction

The Plain-English Receipt: Only 1.2% of prediabetic adults on Tirzepatide progressed to Type 2 diabetes over 3.4 years vs. 19.3% on placebo (Absolute Risk Reduction = 18.1% • Number Needed to Treat = 6).

Two biomedical scientists in white lab coats inside a sunlit medical research laboratory pipetting clinical assay samples and reviewing trial results
Inside the Clinical Evidence Lab: Our research desk audits 6,280 human trials from NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, and NCBI PubMed—reporting true Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and sample sizes (N) without pharma spin.
3. All Indexed Clinical Studies (546)

Gut, Pain & Autoimmune — Clinical Trials & Study Reports (546)

Page 4 of 19 • Sorted by Participant Sample Size (N)
Phase 3 Randomized Trial N = 106

Can This Approach Help? Inside the Latest Research on A low cartilage formation and repair endotype predicts radiographic progression

Serum/plasma level of type II collagen formation, PRO-C2, may be an objective indicator of a low cartilage repair endotype, displaying radiographic progression and superior response to a proanabolic drug.

Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology • 2021-03-09 Read Study
Randomized Controlled Trial N = 100

Randomized Controlled Trial: Effects of intradermal lymphocyte therapy in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigating purinergic signaling, inflammation, and cellular energy status (N = 100)

Low-dose ILT may be associated with improved successful pregnancy and live birth rates in RPL patients. These clinical outcomes coincided with changes in purinergic signaling, inflammatory cytokines, and cellular energy status; however, formal mediation cannot be inferred from the present analysis.

Molecular biology reports • 2026-11-06 Read Study
Randomized Controlled Trial PMID 42985783

Randomized Controlled Trial: Effectiveness of a Structured Post-Platelet Rich Plasma Rehabilitation Approach on Pain and Function in Subacromial Pain Syndrome

Corbin Posture Scale scores decreased in both groups (p < 0.05). Pain reduction was greater in the study group (VAS: from 9.00 ± 0.67 to 2.92 ± 1.14 versus from 9.11 ± 0.64 to 7.96 ± 0.75; SF-MPQ: from 27.07 ± 4.41 to 10.07 ± 3.33 versus from 21.33 ± 2.46 to 19.37 ± 2.35; p < 0.001).

Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy • 2027-01-15 Read Study
Evidence Methodology, PubMed Verification & YMYL Standards

Frequently Asked Questions About dotMD Clinical Trial Breakdowns

Why does dotMD report both Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) on clinical trials?

Traditional health headlines often exaggerate findings by reporting only Relative Risk Reduction—for example, claiming a drug cuts risk by 50% when the event rate dropped from 2% to 1% (an Absolute Risk Reduction of just 1.0 percentage point, meaning 100 patients must take the drug for 1 person to benefit, or NNT = 100). On dotMD, every flagship study breakdown reports both Relative Risk and Absolute Risk alongside the exact sample size (N) and trial duration.

How does dotMD separate human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from animal or observational studies?

Every study on dotMD displays its exact Study Design Tier at the top of the card (Phase 3 Randomized Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial, Meta-Analysis & Systematic Review, Multi-Trial Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Journal Watch Cohort, or FDA Safety Alert) along with the human participant count (N). Preclinical mouse or cell-culture data is never presented as human clinical proof.

Why did dotMD replace synthetic "Study Rigor Scores" with primary PubMed PMIDs and trial metadata?

Arbitrary 0-to-100 rigor scores obscure what actually makes a study trustworthy. Instead of synthetic scores, dotMD surfaces the verifiable primary evidence signals: exact NCBI PubMed IDs (PMID), ClinicalTrials.gov registration numbers (NCT), double-blind vs. crossover design, sample size (N), p-values / Hazard Ratios, and study limitations.

How do dotMD Research Breakdowns connect to Conditions, Medications, Supplements, and Specialist Doctors?

Medical research is only useful if you can act on it safely with your clinician. Every flagship research synthesis links directly to the parent Condition diagnostic cutoff guide, the Medication FDA DailyMed & CMS NADAC wholesale price ledger, the Supplement elemental weight decoder, and our High-CPT-Volume Specialist Directory.